"The commission handling workers’ claims and the courts
that supervise it have endlessly expanded the liability of employers,
forgetting that the system was supposed to cover only employment-related
injuries. One Illinois court held, for example, that a worker was
entitled to benefits when he was injured throwing himself up against a
vending machine in an attempt to dislodge a stubborn bag of potato
chips. The court said that the injured employee was a deserving “Good
Samaritan” on a rescue mission to help a fellow co-worker who had
deposited the coins. The court thought that the defect in the vending
machine “created a need for action to dislodge the bag of Fritos.” (I am
not making this up!)
Illinois’ bottomless workers’ compensation system has contributed to the
state ranking as one of the most labor-expensive states. In the
construction industry, for example, $20 of every $100 of wages goes to
workers’ compensation (in neighboring Indiana it’s less than $5). It is
perhaps one more reason why the state has lost 300,000 manufacturing
jobs since 2000, and why, unlike its Midwest neighbors, it has not
enjoyed any manufacturing job growth since the Great Recession.
In the public sector, the effect is even grimmer. State workers file
workers’ compensation claims far more often than in any other employment
sector, costing more than
4 percent of government payroll. A whopping one third of Illinois state
employees have open claims alleging work-related injuries. (Is it
really that dangerous to work for the state?) The claimants are often
counseled by lawyers, whereas poor Illinois does not have the resources
to either defend this Tsunami of claims or pay the insurance premiums.
It is not obvious why the Illinois workers’ compensation system
unraveled, but let’s see who benefits from this cash cow. As in any
litigation-intensive area, lawyers do well. The paradigm of a
litigation-free insurance system is long dead in Illinois, where 52
percent of workers’ compensation claimants—more than in any other state—are
represented by an attorney. (In neighboring Wisconsin only 13 percent
are represented.) Health care providers also benefit, since the fees for
work injury medical treatments are much higher than the fees Medicare
pays for the same treatments. But a big part of the blame is on judges.
Don't courts realize that dealing out insurance benefits makes premiums
more expensive? That such reckless courtroom generosity would drive
employers out, and the state’s finances to the ground?"
Read more by clicking on this link.
No comments:
Post a Comment